Chapter II. A woman’s intelligence and/or beauty
Why are Russian women more attractive than Western ones?
In the West, this law has been violated, as evidenced by the mass decline in female attractiveness. One of the causes was mentioned here already: the use of DES hormones, as well as contraceptive hormones; the consumption of the latter increased dramatically after WWII even among 14-15-year-old girls. Afore all else, this development, perfectly naturally, doubles, triples the negative effect on the female essence. As for the side effect, it started showing not only in the women’s psycho-physiological traits, but even in their morphology: they started ‘growing to manhood,’ with all the male indications.
There is, however, another, no less important cause: the social one. It is the maniacal passion for emancipation, for fighting to achieve so-called equal-rights status with men. In this struggle, Western women clearly went too far. They invaded business, politics, science, losing in the process their natural predestinations, including the most important one: preservation and continuation of the human species. Note: they have little success in the male professions anyway, with rare exceptions. I discussed science already. The same is true in politics. The objection I usually get is this: what about Margaret Thatcher? She was a very clever politician. - How was this cleverness manifested? – I ask. – Well, the economy grew at a good pace during her rule. – True, but what did Mrs. Thatcher have to do with it? In the years of her rule, the economies of all industrial countries grew at a good pace in accordance with the laws of economic cycles. This owes nothing to Margaret Thatcher. In this connection a quote from Hegel is relevant once again: “If women were to control the government, the state would be in danger, for they do not act according to the dictates of universality, but are influenced by accidental inclinations and opinions.” (144)
A political intellect is one that changes the map of the world in favor of its country. Such were the minds of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Bismarck, Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong. (There are, though, criminal politicians who also change the map of the world, but in favor of their state’s enemies. Typical examples: Hitler, Gorbachev, Yeltsin.) There is not one woman among such politicians, and that is normal. When a woman holds power in a state, that is abnormal, for this woman is separated from her family, her children – a woman’s true predestinations. The same is true of businesswomen. A publication at the University of Massachusetts (USA) reports that at least 60% of women in top managerial positions experience significant hair loss, with half of them in danger of going bald. (Just think how nonsensical the equation is: man = woman. In the language of philosophy, this amounts to an empty identity, with no development. In general, any kind of equality leads to death, while inequality creates the charge needed for motion.)
The female mind is by nature irrational; it is geared toward everyday life, an area in which the male mind is not powerful. Violence inflicted on their nature caused women to lose their female qualities. Hence their unattractiveness.
The other side of the problem is declining birth rates among the West’s white population, and in general the crisis of the traditional family, which will be discussed later yet.
One more factor maiming women is sports: track and field, gymnastics and such. Worse: the idiocy is progressing, and they have now graduated to weightlifting, wrestling and boxing. These so-called women turn into something like gym apparatus; they are frightful to behold.
When women work in the police force, in the armed forces and in male professions in general, it amounts to equally bad violence inflicted on self. For example, quite a few women serve in the British Army. Their training regimen used to be lighter than the standard norm; still, the incidence of injuries and disabilities among servicewomen was four times higher than that among servicemen. In 1998 under pressure from organizations demanding “equality for all” the government decreed that men and women would follow the same training regimen – “on equal-rights basis,” so to say. Five years later, men had 147 total injuries per 10,000 personnel, while women had 1,113 - almost eight times more. The Ministry of Defense responded to this news with the announcement that in today’s army there are opportunities that require “more brain than brawn.”[1] In actual fact one gets the impression that the heads of both the military and the women who champion “equal rights” are full of nothing but “brawn” that has crowded out the brains.
All the developments discussed above certainly do exist in Russia, but fortunately, however, not to the same degrees and not on the same scale as in the West. This is precisely why Russian women manage to preserve their femininity, their beauty. I read once an article by a Canadian film director who complained that it is difficult to find a beautiful woman for a film role in Canada. He also admitted that he could find any number of beautiful girls for his cast in just one hour in the Moscow Metro. I’m certain that in any provincial town in Russia he would meet more beautiful girls in one day than he would in Canada or any other Western country in his entire life.
All the above-mentioned factors and phenomena have caused North American and European men to start marrying Oriental and Russian women, who, fortunately, are not all that eager to fight for equal rights with men. When you meet an attractive white girl in the West, there is an 80% chance that she is Russian, or Ukrainian, or East European.
In other words, only those women preserve beauty who for some reasons, objective or subjective, did not become separated from the nature of their predestination.
* * *
Ordinarily when I reason in this fashion on the topic of men and women, critics come down on me en masse and tell me that I am a woman-hater. I reject this charge. Everything I said above does not mean that all women are supposed to do is give birth, raise children and indulge their husbands. Of course they must have freedom to do anything toward which their souls and talents are disposed. There are certain areas in some spheres, including even science, where women are capable of doing more and better things than men, especially where patience and painstaking work is required. I speak of priorities here, and the main priority is the continuation and preservation of the human species. Man’s priority is extending the lifespan of the human species. This is how everything will be put in its proper place. Women will remain women – always beautiful – and men will remain men, always intelligent. That’s all there is to it.
And now it is time to move on to family.
[1] The Times, March 22, 2005, 6.
On Love, Family, and the State
(Philosophical-sociological Essay)